A Looking Glass Fogged :: Journalism Journalist Essays

A Looking Glass FoggedIn reporting, it is sometimes the case that a story is told from a certain prefigure of view due to political pressures, especially when dispute surrounds the subject matter. unity such case is the reporting on the Chinese-Tibetan conflict, in which chinas overwhelming political and fiscal power has the potential to seep into the affairs of newspaper owners. In my paper, I forget examine a certain event as it was published in a variety of newspapers, and how their coverage differs from the AP Worldstream report. Additionally, I result analyze what appears to be an extremely one-sided report and how it is of benefit to its publisher.China has always sought to ethnically integrate Tibet with the Chinese mainland, for reasons as various(a) as the parties involved. Recently this has expressed itself in the form of a plotted railway reaching from Beijing to Lhasa, the Tibetan Capital. China has justified this activeness with its usual stance on Tibetan integrat ion, as an effort to uprise Tibet for its own good and provide it with an influx of labor and industry. Groups opposed to the project upkeep that the railway will cause a new wave of Chinese settlers who will dilute the regions unique culture and exploit the land for its resources. (AP-Worldstream)The Associated defend is a news source for news sources. Their business consists of covering events and reselling the reports to a variety of papers, so it is in their interest to stay as apathetic as possible. In their coverage of the Railway project they cover both sides equally, starting with Chinas moral obligation to enrich the Tibetan culture with an inflow of Chinese culture and labor. To quote Shi, an overseer Tibet has been without the railway, but now they will have the same great things and great life as us.(2) succession the Chinese side makes no mention of this, the AP report covers political motives for this $3.3 zillion investment. With the squeeze in place, China wo uld be able to immediately deploy troops to stomp any sort of Tibetan uprising as well as saturate the area and culture with Chinese immigrants, furthering Chinas intrigue on the Tibetan region. The article does a thorough job of masking both unrelenting sides of the issue - the Chinese developers zeal for getting the railroad underway and wants for further development, employment and opportunities, and the Tibetan fear of exploitation and cultural dilution.