Immigration and Change as Natural :: Globalization Immigration Migration Essays

in-migration and Change as NaturalVoyages From Tongan Villages to American Suburbs, by Cathy A. Small, is some(prenominal) interesting and entertaining reading. This ethnography of social change of a Pacific island nation, is a fine example of how a system of chiefdoms evolves into a financial system. It also served to demonstrate how this process affected immigration in mainstream America. My origin reaction stemmed from a political theory class I took. This in conjunction with, sociologist Saskia Sassens article Why Migration , about the reasons why migration has become a key element of contemporary global caller, brought to intellectual the writings of Karl Marx. Marx who lived from 1818-1883, write extensively on the capitalist form of g everyplacenment and criticized it openly. Although I do not agree with the Marxist school of melodic theme in general, I saw many truths in the things that he proclaimed. Among these he addressed the inroads of capitalism and its cor ruption of other societies. These issues, along with the many readings we flummox had, brought to the forefront some of my own feeling of discontent with our present society and world globalization, a discontent different and at times in truth similar to those who migrate. In Why Migration?, Sassen states, The central role played by the United States in the emergence of a global economy over the past 30 years lies at the core of why volume migrate here in ever increasing numbers(Sassen 14). The generator goes on to tell how the flow of capitalist goods, services and information creates connect between the United States and other countries. These links become bridges crosswise which migrants, like the Tongans flow. With this in mind I could not help idea how right Marx was, and how well he had forecasted Tongan transnationalism. In The German political orientation Marx writes, in reference to capitalists and their goods, in place of old wants satisfied by the product ion of the country, we find new wants requiring for satisfaction the production of distant lands and culture. He also writes, In place of the old local and national privateness and self-sufficiency we have intercourse in every direction, universal mutuality of nations (Marx 162). This to me best sums up the transition of Tongan society. It seems to be the epitome of the issues Sassen embossed in Why Migration?, issues that were relevant in Tongas new install transnationalism.