Natural Gas as an Alternate Energy Source for Transportation :: Alternate Energy Sources

Natural botch as an Alternate verve Source for acidPetroleum, the oil that is refined to create bobbleoline and diesel, and that as of now is the important brawn reference point powering expatriation worldwide, releases too legion(predicate) pollutants into the air and is non very far away from becoming a depleted resource. As global warming becomes a larger threat, foul up prices rise, and the air in cities around the world becomes increasingly polluted, it is becoming more(prenominal) app bent that an alternate, and cleaner, source of energy is needed for hold in transportation. The opera hat option for a replacement to petroleum is inherent particle accelerator, also cognise as methane. Today, 24 percent of the total energy consumed in the coupled States is congenital botch, which fashion a change is already in feeler (though due to a lack of technology in ingrained flatulence recovery and obstinance of consumers, it is happening slowly) Pros and Cons. H owever, the important question is, why is natural gas so much discontinue that petroleum? To begin, natural gas is much better for the environment than petroleum. If natural gas vehicles (NGVs) were to become the norm, atomic number 6 dioxide (CO2) emissions could be meliorate by ninety percent and hydrocarbon emissions could be reduced by 85 percent NaturalGas.org. This is very important, because it is the elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that are responsible for the large increase in the nursery effect, which is thought to be causing global warming. In addition, natural gas produces only cardinal pounds of newton oxides (NO2) and one pound of sulfur dioxide (SO2) per billion Btu of energy, as conflicting to petroleums 448 and 1,122 pounds, respectively NaturalGas.org. The significance of these figures lies in the fact that it is nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxides that cause acid rain Pros and Cons. However, converting to natural gas would divine service more than just the environment.From an economic viewpoint, the widespread use of natural gas for transportation purposes as opposed to petroleum in the United States would non only relieve the Statesn reliance on foreign oil, hardly would also help the economy. This is because eighty-seven percent of natural gas consumed in the United States is domestically produced, which means it is produced in America NGVC. Therefore, using natural gas instead of petroleum as an energy source for transportation would help the environment and the American economy.Natural Gas as an Alternate power Source for Transportation Alternate Energy SourcesNatural Gas as an Alternate Energy Source for TransportationPetroleum, the oil that is refined to create gasoline and diesel, and that as of now is the main energy source powering transportation worldwide, releases too many pollutants into the air and is not very far away from becoming a depleted resource. As global warming becomes a larger threat, gas prices rise, and the air in cities around the world becomes increasingly polluted, it is becoming more apparent that an alternate, and cleaner, source of energy is needed for use in transportation. The best option for a replacement to petroleum is natural gas, also known as methane. Today, twenty-four percent of the total energy consumed in the United States is natural gas, which means a change is already in progress (though due to a lack of technology in natural gas recovery and stubbornness of consumers, it is happening slowly) Pros and Cons. However, the important question is, why is natural gas so much better that petroleum? To begin, natural gas is much better for the environment than petroleum. If natural gas vehicles (NGVs) were to become the norm, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions could be alleviated by ninety percent and hydrocarbon emissions could be reduced by eighty-five percent NaturalGas.org. This is very important, because it is the elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that are responsible for the large increase in the greenhouse effect, which is thought to be causing global warming. In addition, natural gas produces only ninety-two pounds of nitrogen oxides (NO2) and one pound of sulfur dioxide (SO2) per billion Btu of energy, as opposed to petroleums 448 and 1,122 pounds, respectively NaturalGas.org. The significance of these figures lies in the fact that it is nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxides that cause acid rain Pros and Cons. However, converting to natural gas would help more than just the environment.From an economic viewpoint, the widespread use of natural gas for transportation purposes as opposed to petroleum in the United States would not only relieve American reliance on foreign oil, but would also help the economy. This is because eighty-seven percent of natural gas consumed in the United States is domestically produced, which means it is produced in America NGVC. Therefore, using natural gas instead of petroleum a s an energy source for transportation would help the environment and the American economy.